A finite difference model is one which employs finite difference methods. The resolution of a finite difference model is determined by the spacing of the discrete set of points (grid points) used to approximate the derivatives.
As a general rule, at least 5 grid points (or 4 grid intervals) are needed to define a wave-like weather phenomenon; even through 2-grid-interval sampling is minimum requirement for a wave phenomenon. For example, a model with a horizontal resolution of 125 km can resolve only horizontal phenomena of 500 km or greater. Vertical resolution defines the resolution between the earth's surface and the top of the model. In many cases vertical resolution is variable. For example, a model with 21 vertical levels may have 7 levels in the region below the 850-hPa level. In this case, processes in the boundary layer will be much better represented than if the levels were evenly spaced in the vertical.
The One Way Influence Tropical Cyclone Model (OTCM) is an example of a one way influence model because it uses information from NOGAPS, but it does not influence NOGAPS.
A few advantages of spectral methods are that they can be computational efficient, provide for elimination of computational instability, and make some derived quantities easy to compute. Some disadvantages are that discrete phenomena are not suitable for spectral representation, computational efficiency decreases quickly as model resolution is increased, and output from spectral models must be transformed to a grid ("transform grid") for graphical display.
From a forecaster's standpoint, model resolution is more important than the computational methods used in a model because model resolution is related to the scale of weather phenomena that a model can represent. The following formula can be used to estimate the distance X between grid points on the transform grid of a spectral model:
X (in km) = 40,000 * COSINE (degree latitude) / (4*(N+1)),
where N is the model truncation wave number. For example, in a T79 spectral model (The letter "T" in T79 indicates a triangular truncation, a type of wave number truncation currently used in spectral models), we have X = 40000 / (4*(79+1)) = 125 km at the equator where COSINE(0) is equal to 1. This is roughly equivalent to 1.25 degrees longitude spacing at the equator. Therefore, equatorial weather phenomena with wave lengths shorter than 500 km are not represented in the T79 spectral model.
A similar formula can also be used to estimate the distance X between grid points on the transform grid of a spectral model:
X (in km) = 40,000 * COSINE (degree latitude) / (3*(N+1)),
this formula provides similar distance value as the first formula.
If the maximum wind zone associated with a mature TC has an average width of about 50 km, what is the minimum model resolution sufficient to resolve the maximum wind zone of a TC in the equatorial zone? The answer is approximately a T800 spectral model. Fast computers, alternative computation methods and physics formulations are required in such models.
Currently even the fastest computers cannot run a T800 global model in a reasonable period of time. Therefore, for TC structure studies, we must use high resolution fine mesh models to resolve TC structure.
At FNMOC, the TC bogus is a set of synthetic surface and upper-air observations to 400 hPa. These observations are symmetric around the TC warning center position with an observation at the center, four at 220 km, four at 440 km, and four at 660 km from the forecast center.
Appendix B